Showing posts with label Book. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Book. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

5/18 Beethoven and the Piano


I recently read through Jeremy Siepman's The Piano, a nice little 'layman's' volume about the history of the piano and some of it's most famous practitioners.  It normally comes with 3 CDs but the one I got from the "used" book deposit was sadly missing these discs.  Ah well, there's always Youtube.  It had some great things to say about our man B. though...here are some selected highlights (below the video of P.C. 4):

Beethoven - Piano Concerto 4 (Piano: Lukas Geniusas, w Anatoly Levin (conductor))

In 1792, the year after Mozart’s death at 35, a pianistic bombshell burst over the Viennese musical scene. The detonator was a squat, swarthy, uningratiating young man of 22. Born in the provincial city of Bonn in Germany, he was to change the face of Western music to a degree unmatched by any musician before or since. Even as a youth, he fairly bristled with arrogance.

As a pianist, Ludwig van Beethoven was the first to overwhelm the instrument with the force of his own personality. Compared to Mozart or Clementi, his playing may have been a trifle rough and elemental...a born iconoclast, he was prepared to rock any boat, wring any withers, and to challenge all comers. He was the first pianist regularly to overpower his audiences, drawing them into a world of emotional intensity and spiritual daring the like of which had never been experienced before. Particularly in his incomparable improvisations, he often moved his listeners not merely to tears but to uncontrollable sobbing. He tore aside the curtains of eighteenth-century reserve and laid bare the realities of life with a courage bordering on ruthlessness. Even before his Viennese debut, critics recognized the sheer danger in Beethoven’s playing.

As early as the middle 1790s Anton Reicha recalled turning pages for Beethoven in a concerto: ‘I was mostly occupied in wrenching the strings of the piano which snapped, while the hammers stuck among the broken strings. Back and forth I leaped, jerking out a string, disentangling a hammer, turning a page — I worked harder than Beethoven.’
 
Nor was the composer’s frustration confined to matters of volume. He chafed under the restrictions of the piano’s range. The standard grand of the early 1800s had a compass of only 5 1/2 octaves (as against the 7+ we take for granted today). It was a great day for Beethoven when Broadwood of London sent him in 1818 a magnificent instrument with a compass of 6 1/2 octaves and a reservoir of power then unknown in Viennese instruments. And though he soon reduced it to a ruin, ‘its strings broken and tangled, like a thorn bush whipped by a storm’ (Johann Stumpff), ‘its innards blackened by overturned inkwells’ (Ferdinand Ries), and its upper registers mute - ‘as dumb as the musician himself was deaf’ (Sir John Russell) — it inspired him to some of his greatest achievements. Indeed it received its musical baptism with the low C which ends the first movement of his last sonata, Op. 111.

Oddly enough, Beethoven, perhaps the most universal of all composers, was not, in the opinion of many professional singers, a great songwriter. The essence of his pianistic output is to be found in his unparalleled collection of 32 sonatas, which trace his emotional, stylistic and instrumental development from the blazing self-confidence of his ‘angry young man’ phase, through the crisis of his middle years, when the onset of deafness had him hovering on the brink of madness, to the transcendent spiritual and pianistic odyssey of his last 6 sonatas and the towering ‘Diabelli’ Variations. Hardly less remarkable, though, are the 5 mature concertos, the 9 trios, the 10 violin sonatas, the 5 cello sonatas and a host of lesser pieces. What gives this music its unique importance is the unequalled scope of its spiritual journeyings, the unpitying intellect controlling its expression, and the sheer genius and boldness of its formal daring. In its very universality, Beethoven’s music posed a challenge to his successors which few were equipped to address.

Beethoven’s final sonata, Op. 111, widely felt to be the greatest piano sonata ever written, is perhaps the most comprehensive self-portrait ever entrusted to the keyboard. Here, to a degree unmatched in any other work, we find Beethoven the titanic struggler with Fate (the turbulent, highly disciplined 1st movement, which uses every resource available in the piano of his time) and Beethoven the transcendental mystic (2nd movement), whose journey through the extremes of pain and despair resulted in music whose purity, serenity and awe are beyond the power of words to describe. Formally a theme and variations, this valedictory movement amounts by general consent to the most profound amen in pianistic history.

In purely instrumental terms, Beethoven expanded the tonal palette of the piano into realms scarcely hinted at before. His late sonatas are as supremely idiomatic as anything by Liszt, Chopin or Debussy, all of whom he prefigures in one way or another (not least in the mystical haze of his pedal markings in such works as the so-called ‘Moonlight’, ‘Tempest’ and ‘Waldstein’ sonatas). At the same time he seems frequently to have envisaged the piano as a kind of surrogate orchestra. Certainly no pianist, no composer, had ever made such revolutionary demands of the instrument before.
----
The Classical concerto reached its climax with Beethoven, who also forged the key to the Romantic concerto of the nineteenth century. Among Beethoven’s major innovations was the increased importance of the orchestra, to the extent that his last two, despite their three-movement layout, can almost be perceived as symphonies with piano obbligato. He was also the first composer to link movements together without a break (specifically, the middle and last movements of his Fourth and Fifth Concertos).

If Beethoven’s first two concertos can be seen as further developments of the Mozartian model, the Third, in C minor, introduces us to a new figure in the history of the form, and again it mirrors developments in the outside world. Here we get our first glimpse of the Romantic hero in the concerto, the glorious (sometimes vainglorious) individual who dares to stand apart from society and hurl thunderbolts at conventional assumptions.

In his Fourth Concerto he begins the work with a short piano solo, which the orchestra then answers with one of the most magical key changes ever conceived. And in the Fifth (the ‘Emperor’) he allows the orchestra a single introductory chord before the soloist grandiloquently enters with a long, brilliant and resplendent cadenza, enhanced by two widely separated chords of support from the orchestra. With the piano’s heroic credentials firmly established, the orchestra then takes over with an exposition of extraordinary grandeur. For all the heroics of the solo part, this is no Romantic ego-trip but one of Beethoven’s most tightly ‘organic’ works - yet the prevailing feeling is expansive rather than compressed.
Graf Pyramid Piano 1829 (click to enlarge)

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

5/4 Why Einstein Didn't Like Beethoven (Except the Missa Solemnis)

Even though it was recently revealed to me that Stephen Hawking is a big Beethoven fan, apparently another icon of 20th century genius felt differently. Albert Einstein was an actual musician and played the violin (tho not extremely well) and as seen below he much preferred Bach and Mozart...however...

After his colleagues updated the music system they had given him five years earlier, Einstein began repeatedly to play an RCA recording of Beethoven’s Missa Solemnis. It was an unusual choice for two reasons. He tended to regard Beethoven, who was not his favorite composer, as “too personal, almost naked.” Also, his religious instincts did not usually include these sorts of trappings. “I am a deeply religious nonbeliever,” he noted to a friend who had sent him birthday greetings. “This is a somewhat new kind of religion.”
- From Walter Isaacson’s Einstein: His Life and Universe (Simon and Schuster, 2007)

Responses to a questionnaire. Though the questionnaire itself appears to have been lost, "...the questions on it can be inferred more or less from Einstein's responses..."

(1) Bach, Mozart, and some old Italian and English composers are my favorites in music. Beethoven considerably less -- but certainly Schubert.

(2) It is impossible for me to say whether Bach or Mozart means more to me. In music I do not look for logic. I am quite intuitive on the whole and know no theories. I never like a work if I cannot intuitively grasp its inner unity (architecture).

(3) I always feel that Handel is good -- even perfect -- but that he has a certain shallowness. Beethoven is for me too dramatic and too personal.

(4) Schubert is one of my favorites because of his superlative ability to express emotion and his enormous powers of melodic invention. But in his larger works I am disturbed by a certain lack of architectonics [German: "Architektonik"].

(5) Schumann is attractive to me in his smaller works because of their originality and richness of feeling, but his lack of formal greatness prevents my full enjoyment. In Mendelssohn I perceive considerable talent but an indefinable lack of depth that often leads to banality.

(6) I find a few lieder and chamber works by Brahms truly signficant, also in their structure. But most of his works have for me no inner persuasiveness. I do not understand why it was necessary to write them.

(7) I admire Wagner's inventiveness, but I see his lack of architectural structure as decadence. Moreover, to me his musical personality is indescribably offensive so that for the most part I can listen to him only with disgust.

(8) I feel that [Richard] Strauss is gifted, but without inner truth and concerned only with outside effects. I cannot say that I care nothing for modern music in general. I feel that Debussy is delicately colorful but shows a poverty of structure. I cannot work up great enthusiasm for something of that sort.
(from Albert Einstein's Taste in Music (on Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, et al.))

Missa Solemnis in D, Op.123 (1823)
Luba Orgonasova, soprano, Catherine Robbin, mezzo-soprano, Anthony Rolfe Johnson, tenor, Alastair Miles, bass
NDR-Chor / Monteverdi Choir / NDR Sinfonieorchester / John Eliot Gardiner, conductor
Recorded at Marienkirche Lübeck, 1994

Linklist (71 min)

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

4/13 How Twelve-Tone Music Works

Recently I've been reading this book, "Music in the 20th Century", William W. Austin which gives a pretty good introduction to Schoenberg and his method of 12-tone composition. I thought I might as well record what I've learned on the Daily Beethoven at least for my own edification. "LvB and More", right?

Schoenberg's concept of 12-tone music means the application of 12 unique pitches in a specified sequence or "row". To make a 12-tone row he puts the 12 different notes of the chromatic scale in a desirable order without repeating any of them.

Ex. -  G, F#, B, G#, E, A#, A, C, D#, C#, D, F

This row is also usually used in 3 different variations: upside down (inversion), backwards (retrograde), or upside-down AND backwards (retrograde inversion).

So that's all I knew for the last 20 years basically about "dodecaphonic music". In the last year, from conversations with a music educator friend and from the book above I've learned much more about 12-tone. 

The 12-tone row doesn't have to be single notes going from left to right. It can also go horizontally, suddenly go backwards, then forwards, etc... The horizontal aspect really blew my mind. Theoretically the row could be written as just be one 12-note chord - or an 11-note chord followed by 1 note. Basically any horizontal or vertical direction is allowed and you can even "go around" notes and come back to them later at the end. The main thing is that the notes are not repeated.

But wait! Here's another eye-opener (at least for me). I just wrote that notes should not be repeated. That's not literally true. Each of the 12 notes in a row should be thought of as entities, not mere pitch frequencies. By entities, I mean each note in the row could appear as a trill or as a "tremolo". By tremolo I really mean that the note can be repeated - but you cannot have a different note between the reappearance of the same note (AAABBB is OK, AABBBA is not OK). Schoenberg uses the 12-note row more like a "concept" of 12 unique entities based on pitches. I suppose if one were to take that concept to an extreme, you could play a non-12-tone phrase, such as "Ode to Joy" in the key of A, then the key of A#, then B, etc....(or any order of keys) and you could say that was a 12-tone application to "Ode to Joy".

Finally, the row can be stated, and then immediately restated in any register. So you could have a row with the starting note F, then repeat the row in F#. The whole piece doesn't have to obey this same sequence over and over again. The row can be treated pretty much as a motif.  Basically as long as you can draw a circle around a bunch of notes and none of them "repeat" (see above) then that's a 12-tone moment. The next phrase can be in any key really.

Finally - and this is probably the MOST IMPORTANT rule about 12-tone composition:

THERE ARE NO RULES.

What I mean is that 12-tone is a tool used to break free from traditional harmony of the 19th century and if at any time one decides that it would be nice to have that first note repeated at the end of the phrase - it's perfectly fine. The 12-tone system is more like a "recipe" kind of rule. It's a good way to get some new flavors but if you want to substitute lemon juice for vinegar it's OK, you can still call it salad dressing. Schoenberg himself broke the 12-tone rule all the time. Once, when someone wrote to him pointing out that the had repeated a note within his tone row, Schoenberg basically told him that his music was to be listened to, not studied.

"My works are twelve-tone compositions, not twelve-tone compositions."  
(Schoenberg letter to annoying nit-picking fan)

I highly recommend the website of the Schoenberg Center.  There you can listen to every single Schoenberg work for free.

A perfect example of the 12-tone technique at work is Op. 25, Suite for Piano, Nr. 5: Menuett. Trio (1923).  This was one of the earliest and most succinct 12-tone works Schoenberg wrote.  The Austin book analyzes the rows in that piece very well.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

4/12 Desert Island Discs

Recently you may have heard that the BBC has begun opening up their archives of the Desert Island Discs program for free web streaming. I have to admit, I'd never heard of this program, but apparently it's the longest-running radio program in existence. Oops. However that makes it a veritable treasure trove of undiscovered music goodies for new listeners like me. Interestingly enough, this Desert Island Discs program doesn't just approach musicians like most interviews of this type - scientists, administrators, politicians, teachers, actors, etc...are all included - which makes for some interesting commonalities.

For example, Stephen Hawking and Yoko Ono both chose Edith Piaf as one of their 8 desert discs! I don't think a sentence with those 3 names together has ever been published before.

Anyways, as far as Beethoven is concerned, I was pretty impressed that our man B. got the most "hits" out of the entire history of the show. Who says Beethoven isn't still relevant?

Some of the people who included B. on their D.I.D. list includes:
James Ellroy (crime writer)
Ralph Fiennes (Lord Voldemort)
Richard Dreyfuss (Mr. Holland)
James Mason (Captain Nemo)
Roald Dahl (Wonkabars and Oompa Loompa)
Margaret Thatcher (former politician)
Marlene Dietrich (Screen Goddess)
Vivien Leigh (Marion Crane from Hitchcock's "Psycho")
Martin Sheen (former President of the United States)
Sir Ian McKellen (Gandalf, Magneto, etc)
J K Rowling (children's book writer)
Dr Jane Goodall (Ape Scientist)
Dave Brubeck ("Take 5")
Stephen Hawking (Gravity Scientist)
Christopher Reeve (Superman)
Peter Maxwell Davies (Composer - great choices)
Mel Brooks (Created Young Frankenstein)
Sir Alec Guinness (Obi-Wan Kenobi)
Vincent Price (Dr. Phibes)
John Barry (made 007 theme famous)
Elvis Costello (His Aim Is True)
Arthur C Clarke (Why no LvB in 2001:A Space Odyssey?)
Dudley Moore (The real Arthur)
William Hartnell (Doctor Who)
Aaron Copland (wrote Wide World of Sports theme (wink))

Anyways, these people chose one or more Beethoven works as 1 of their 8 desert island recordings.  Obviously the selection of interviewees tends toward the British side of things, so I wonder how a survey like this would go in America?

Here's the full list of all the people who selected Beethoven.

At present only 500 programs are available leading up to March 11 and going forwards, but I believe they will add more as time goes by.  You can see the lists tho for the entire history of the show.  Have fun!

(The James Ellroy interview is pretty good - he lists I think 5 works and he obviously loves Beethoven.)

Below is Sir Ian McKellen's Beethoven pick:
String Quartet in Bb Major, Opus 130: II. Presto 
Cypress Quartet (Sir Ian actually chose the Lindsays)


Today's post is kind of a fluff piece - that's because tomorrow and the next are going to be kind of  "academic" ones...but I hope they will be fun.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

3/30 "B's Way" (Beethoven's Metronome Tempos)

One of the most controversial aspects of performing Beethoven's music today is tempo.  In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Beethoven's symphonies were usually played at a "measured" pace to allow the sonorities of a huge orchestra in a huge audience hall to wash over the listeners.  Some people also contend that orchestras were not "good enough" to play at a faster pace.  There were exceptions of course, like Toscanini and Weingartner, but they were sometimes derided for being to metronomic and rushed.  In modern practice, fast tempos have made a kind of comeback, thanks largely in part to the "historical performance" trend, where smaller forces are used on original instruments.  It's much easier to play the 2nd Symphony with an orchestra a third the size of a typical Mahler-style orchestra.

But the main point of today's post is about B.'s written metronome marks.  The metronome was invented much later than many of his works were composed, so B. went back to his old scores and retro-actively applied ("ret-conned") metronome markings to these works from 20 years past.  Almost invariably, these markings were faster than any ensemble or performer could comfortably play.  A famous violinist was once asked about these markings and he remarked, "well of course, that's ridiculous".  Was B.'s metronome defective?  Did B. misjudge the tempos of his works in retrospect?  It's common for composers to envision a specific tempo at the manuscript table, and then change his mind at the rehearsal hall because it was too fast.  Also B. was never really good at numbers by his own admittance. 
"Evidence clearly shows that the composer would, for example, simply add up the number 9 seven times to arrive at the sum of 63. The young Gerhard tried to rectify this by tutoring Beethoven in the intricacies of multiplication."
The other thing that performers mention is that there is sometimes an inconsistemcy to his actual metronome choices.  There is at least one case where a metronome marking contradicts an accelerando instruction or a ritard.  One doesn't 'speed up' to a slower speed (actually I can't recall if that's exactly case I saw explained, but it was something along those lines).

Still, it's hard to believe the greatest musical genius of all time couldn't figure out how to work a metronome.  As Ben Zander says, he was DEAF, not BLIND.  And current performing practices show that it is possible to play B.'s works at B.'s tempos (a little aside - with MIDI you can set any tempo you want.  I once put the Moonlight Sonata at 3000 bpm just for fun).  Personally I much prefer the faster versions according to the written tempos.  It's worse to be too slow, than to be too fast, for my tastes.  Beethoven's compositions were at the cutting edge of harmony and technology at the time, so why shouldn't they still be at the cutting edge of performance practice?  No one ever claimed playing Beethoven was easy.

Here's a great chart detailing B.'s metronome markings (from Cliff Eisen, "Notation and Interpretation", A Performer's Guide to Music of the Classical Period, Anthony Burton Ed., ABRSM Publishing)
More on Beethoven's Metronome Markings
CRITIC'S NOTEBOOK; PONDERING BEETHOVEN'S METRONOME - New York Times
Metronome Techniques (An Online Guide to Metronome use)

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

3/1 Fantasia on a 1-Note Motif (Opus 77)

("Is this some kind of joke?")
I recently read an interesting article by musicologist Hugh Macdonald about Beethoven's Fantasia in Gm Op. 77. The first time I heard this piano piece I had to check the track name to make sure I hadn't put in some 20th Century piece by accident. It starts out with crazy untethered glissandos across the keyboard, changes key, then a couple minutes later goes into some kind of "jazzy" cadenza..and then it gets strange. A piece is usually called a "fantasia" because it doesn't fall under the category of anything else, such as Sonata, Minuet, Polonaise, Bagatelle, etc... I always think of fantasias as "slowly composed improvisations". However in Op.77 Beethoven really takes things to an extreme. The Bernstein quote I use at the top of the blog talks about how B.'s work is inevitable - every note is perfect in its place. But then how does one explain Op.77 which seems to challenge the listener with its abrupt changes in key, tempo and flow? Motifs appear once and then never again... What kind of theme-development is that? 

Macdonald in his article claims that the theme of Op.77 is that "there is no theme". In other words the underlying thread tying this work as a coherent unit is basically CHAOS. Hmmm...that sounds positively "Cagean". Macdonald goes on to say, "he had the rarer desire..to tease and deceive us, an impulse that betrays a seriously disturbing attitude that will make many of his admirers uncomfortable." Maybe Macdonald did not have many friends who were part of the avant-garde crowd...

Macdonald:
Macdonald goes on to list a few works which have some extreme contrasts designed to create "disruption", such as the first 2 movements of the Moonlight Sonata, Sonata Op.111's two contrasting movements.  Later on, he also mentions and expounds upon the premature horn in the "Eroica" recap, the sudden mood change in the "Eroica" finale from violent fanfare to delicate ballet (in the wrong key), abrupt contrasts in the Waldstein sonata, Cello Sonata Op.69, String Quartet Op.95 (Serioso), etc...

However, back to the Fantasy in G: "it has the potential to derail the whole apparatus of criticism" (I find that claim to be both profound and kind of hilarious actually).  He does admit that the piece has two "formal" elements, the glissando motif and the set of variations in B Major from bar 157 - but these are just another example of being "inconsistently inconsistent by introducing the semblance of order in a totally disorderly piece."  Several approaches have been made to explain this crazy fantasia - Czerny: "an improvisation", Wilhelm de Lenz: "a medieval drama", Tovey: "hopelessness...questions and efforts", Paul Bekker: " a one-tone motif" (I love that one!).  Macdonald jettisons all of the above as unsatisfactory and states the only way to interpret it is "to regard the piece's dis-unity, diversity, illogicality, inconsistencies, and contradictions as themselves the principal idea of the piece...to mislead our dull brains and to leave us baffled and breathless...defiantly illogical.  The point is that it has no structural point."

Anyways at the end of the article he kind of supposes that all these surprises and disruptions are intended denigrate and "humiliate" the listener in some way - like some kind of puppet-master, or a cat playing with a mouse.  The article is well-written and has some interesting points but I pretty much disagree with many of his conclusions.  From a 21st Century viewpoint Opus 77 hardly seems inconsistent or incoherent (one supposes B wrote this piece for "a later age" as he used to say) and tho B. was pretty mischievous in his 30's at times, he was very fond of his admirers (especially the female ones) and Macdonald seems to place a bit too much of a misanthropic cast on Beethoven's personality.  Whenever I hear these bizarre turns and sudden mood-changes I have to hold in my laughter - from where I'm standing we're in on the joke.

Read the full article HERE (despite my criticism of it, it's still excellently presented...)

And here's this crazy "neo-classical" piece with score:
Beethoven - Fantasia op. 77 (Dino Ciani)

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

2/8 Beethoven's 8th: "So much better!" (Color Analysis)

After all this time I just realized I don't have one single post on Beethoven's 8th Symphony - and that's one my favorites, too!

From Wiki : When asked by his pupil Carl Czerny why the Eighth was less popular than the Seventh, Beethoven is said to have replied, "because the Eighth is so much better." A critic wrote that "the applause it [the Eighth Symphony] received was not accompanied by that enthusiasm which distinguishes a work which gives universal delight; in short—as the Italians say—it did not create a furor."

Sadly under-rated even today, the 8th has a regal and energetic 1st movement, a novel "metronome-like" 2nd movement, a 3rd movement characterized by a "drunken" minuet, and a 4th movement which takes off at full speed and includes some hilarious hairpin harmonic turns.

So here comes my new favorite standby, the color waveform analysis....pictures (especially moving ones) are worth a thousand cadence descriptions... Another thing worth mentioning is that this performance was conducted by Felix Weingartner, who was the first to record all 9 Beethoven symphonies to disc.  In fact Weingartner even wrote a book describing the correct way to conduct Beethoven: "On the Performance of Beethoven's Symphonies".  I chose a recording from archive.org so that those annoying Youtube ads would not pop up....

SYMPHONY No.8 in F major, Op.93 (1812)
Conductor : Felix Weingartner, Vienna Philharmonic
Columbia 78rpm Set M-292 (CHAX 89 - 94), Recorded February 25-26, 1936, Digital transfer by F. Reeder
 
0:00   1. Allegro vivace e con brio
7:15   2. Allegretto scherzando
10:53 3. Tempo di Menuetto
15:00 4. Allegro vivace



Movement 1: Allegro vivace e con brio
Exposition
1st Theme (BROWN)
Bridge (BLUE)
2nd Theme (GREEN)
Cadence Section (MAROON)
Development (VIOLET)
Recapitulation
1st Theme (BROWN)
Bridge (BLUE)
2nd Theme (GREEN)
Cadence Section (MAROON)
Coda (PURPLE)

Movement 2: Allegretto scherzando starting at 7:15
1st Theme (OLIVE)
2nd Theme (BLUE)
Cadence (DARK GREEN)
1st Theme (OLIVE)
2nd Theme (BLUE)
Cadence (DARK GREEN)
Coda (VIOLET) 

Movement 3: Tempo di Menuetto starting at 10:53
Part A (Minuet) (PURPLE)
Part B (Trio) (VIOLET)
Part A (Minuet) (PURPLE)

Movement 4: Finale starting at 15:00
Exposition
1st Theme (BROWN)
2nd Theme (BLUE)
Development 1 (PURPLE)
Recapitulation 1
1st Theme (BROWN)
2nd Theme (BLUE)
Development 2 (PURPLE)
Recapitulation 2
1st Theme (BROWN)
2nd Theme (BLUE)
Coda (MAROON)

Some more analysis notes: http://musicianmatters.com/music-analysis/beethovens-symphony-8/

Friday, January 28, 2011

1/28 Beethoven's Full Monty (Python)

Myna Bird
It's Friday, which means time for some light entertainment....here's a pretty humorous set of variations on "Happy Birthday" based on various themes by Beethoven, including Moonlight, Pathetique, etc...
Uploaded to Youtube by davidhertzberg:
In this Columbia Masterworks recording released in 1970, the American concert pianist and composer Leonid Hambro (1920 - 2006) performs his composition, "Happy Birthday Dear Ludwig," a set of piano variations in the style of Beethoven on the tune "Happy Birthday." Woven into the variations are Beethoven's Bagatelle, Op. 119, the Minuet in G, the Pathetique and Moonlight Sonatas, Fur Elise and the theme of the first movement of Symphony No. 5. I created this music video from the LP, "Happy Birthday Ludwig," serial number MS 7406, shown above. The video opens with images from the LP jacket.  This LP was issued to commemorate the 200th anniversary of Beethoven's birth (1770). It is a compilation of recordings of Beethoven's works, featuring artists such as Hambro, Rudolf Serkin, Glenn Gould, Philippe Entremont, Leonard Bernstein and Eugene Ormandy, issued previously on the Columbia label. So that there is no question in the mind of the listener, I rely principally on images of the LP and LP jacket in order to document the authenticity of historically important recordings such as these. All selections on this LP, with one exception (the first track on side 2) are in the public domain.


Dudley Moore did a similar thing with the theme from "Bridge over the River Kwai" -
Uploaded by jondinerstein:
In this clip from the 1950's-60s British comedy group "Beyond the Fringe," Dudley Moore plays a very funny but also very musically well-done parody of a Beethoven Piano Sonata, using the famous whistling tune from "Bridge Over the River Kwai" as a thematic subject.


Since this post is kind of in a "humor mode" I might as well add Monty Python's Beethoven sketch...
Transcript HERE.


Lately I've been coming across so many "longer features" that it's hard to just reserve them for the weekend posts, so maybe some will get out early...

Have you read that book "Beethoven's Hair" by Russell Martin? Personally I haven't, tho I hear it's pretty good. Here's a talk on C-Span about it from 2000. Let me know if it's any good...
Beethoven's Hair discussion

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

1/18 Beethoven was My Piano Tutor

Imagine how many people must have wanted to take piano lessons from Beethoven in his heyday...like taking guitar lessons from Jimi Hendrix!  Actually, Beethoven did teach a few lady friends he was attracted to, but only a few people became his "official" students.
In general Beethoven hated giving lessons.  In his early days in Bonn he gave lessons from age 15 at students' homes but half the time he would knock on the door and then change his mind at the last minute, telling them that he'd come to tell them that he couldn't make it that day.  In his early years at Vienna, he seems to have given lessons to Ferdinand Ries, Carl Czerny...and lots of young women.  A couple ladies were actually virtuosi (Baroness Dorothea von Ertmann, to whom Opus 101 was dedicated being a notable example) but most were young well-to-do women who he eventually fell in love with.  Sadly, people who were able to afford piano teachers were typically looking to marry Counts and Princes...

Ferdinand Ries writes:
"When B. gave me lessons, I must say that contrary to his nature he was extraordinarily patient.  I could only attribute this, and his almost unfailingly amicable behavior towards me, mainly to his love and affection for my father (childhood friend from Bonn).  Thus he sometimes made me repeat a thing 10 times or even more...If I made a mistake somewhere in a passage, or struck wrong notes, or missed intervals  - which he often wanted strongly emphasized - he rarely said anything.  However, if I lacked expression in crescendos, etc. or in the character of a piece, he became angry because, he maintained, the first was accident, while the latter resulted from inadequate knowledge, feeling or attention" (Wegeler).
For counterpoint he would tell students that it took a special kind of teacher to teach that kind of thing and that "Albrechtsberger was the acknowledged master".

As far as piano methods, he disliked books by Hummel, Czerny or Pleyel.  He did however, like studies written by Cramer or Muzio Clementi.  In Gerhard von Breuning's memoir about his childhood spent with Beethoven in his last years, he recounts how B. made an effort to get Clementi's piano instruction text translated into German so young Breuning could make use of it.  While teaching Czerny he also used some exercises from C.P.E. Bach's (J.S. Bach's son) piano method.  Beethoven always had plans to write his own piano method ("I would have written something quite unconventional!") but never got around to it.  Now THAT would have been something!

Well I guess the closest one can get is to read William Newman's "Beethoven on Beethoven: Playing His Piano Music His Way":
From Library Journal/Amazon:  Eminent music scholar Newman, whose three-volume history of the sonata idea is a landmark work in musicology, has brought together his interests in Beethoven and piano playing in this important study of performance practice in Beethoven's piano music. Newman aims to discover how Beethoven actually intended his music to be played. Relying on autograph scores, early editions, Beethoven's letters, and eyewitness accounts of his performances, plus a vast and comprehensive array of source materials, Newman explores all the major issues affecting performance practice. Always fair and judicious, he presents the evidence, sometimes contradictory, and allows the reader to draw conclusions. The value of this book, both as historical study and practical guide, cannot be overstated. Susan Kagan, Hunter Coll., CUNY
Copyright 1989 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Here's a Beethoven lesson that might have been typical tho (starting at 5:23)
;)

Full program below:
8/21 The Genius of Beethoven (2005 TV Mini)

Thursday, January 13, 2011

1/13 Awesome Stories, Primary Sources

Recently I came across a cool website called Awesome Stories which features articles based on "primary sources" - in other words, whatever they write is somewhat more truthful than when people like me write "I think I read somewhere that Beethoven possibly may have..."

"AwesomeStories is about primary sources. The stories exist as a way to place original materials in context and to hold those links together in an interesting, cohesive way (thereby encouraging people to look at them). It is a totally different kind of web site in that its purpose is to place primary sources at the forefront - not the opinions of a writer. Its objective is to take the site's users to places where those primary sources are located."

The articles list the sources of all their facts and have lots of "pop-up" links to relevant images, videos, documents and audio clips.  Fun.

Here's how the one about Beethoven starts:
"A vicious, early-spring storm darkened Vienna's late-afternoon sky.  Suddenly, an enormous thunder-clap reverberated throughout the Schwarzspanierhaus ("House of the Black-Robed Spaniards").  Inside, a man was dying.  Although deaf and comatose, Ludwig van Beethoven seemed startled by the enormous thunder peal.  Lifting his right arm - as though he were a general, commanding an army - the 56-year-old composer momentarily clenched his raised fist.  Seconds later, his arm fell back onto his bed, and Beethoven died.  It was the 26th of March, 1827.

Some people thought Beethoven strange - or even hostile.  Except for his servants, the maestro lived alone, like someone who had been banished. In a way, he was banished.  Separated from the hearing world - in which people listened to his music - Beethoven heard nothing as the sound of his compositions echoed throughout Europe.

How could someone who penned great musical works - like the second movement of his 7th Symphony, or the 9th, or the 5th - create when he was profoundly deaf?  How did he view his genius, coupled with his deafness? Two centuries later, Beethoven's music is still popular.  His influence remains extraordinary.  But ... who was Ludwig - as a boy, as a man and as a musician?"

It's a finely done overview of Beethoven, which you can see in its entirety HERE (as well as lots of other very interesting articles such as BIOGRAPHIES and HISTORY)

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

1/5 Beethoven's 32 Piano Sonatas: An Overview (Libby)

Just came across a 9,700-word essay on all 32 of Beethoven's piano sonatas by writer Ted Libby.  It's actually a feature on Seymour Lipkin's CD website - very nice!  I've read Ted Libby's books and listened to him on NPR - he's good.  Here's a link to the ESSAY.

In case you only have a few minutes maybe I'll "excerpt" a few of his comments (assume everything below in double quotes):

Sonata 1 Op. 2, No. 1
Sonata 2 Op. 2, No. 2
Sonata 3 Op. 2, No. 3
...there is already an "in your face" attitude toward convention in B's approach--...(he) delights in disappointing expectations and throwing syncopations and harmonic raspberries at an unsuspecting listener. He also indulges in his adored practice of tampering with the scansion ("meter rhythm") to produce uneven phrases and measure groups.

Sonata 4 Op. 7
...perhaps the richest and most striking of all of Beethoven's early piano sonatas..

Sonata 5 Op. 10, No. 1
...B. launches the work with a bold, rising figure outlining the C minor triad, which is followed by one of those characteristic gentle answers so often found in his first subjects. The movement is full of breathless agitation.

Sonata 6 Op. 10, No. 2
...a short work with a good deal of humor and a few touches of suppressed anger.

Sonata 7 Op. 10, No. 3
The power of the whole opening is such that one may well imagine this movement coming more as a shock than a revelation to B's hearers; what it reveals to us today is Beethoven writing as Beethoven, perhaps for the first time in his piano sonatas. The centerpiece of the sonata is its slow movement, marked Largo e mesto. It is a movement of enormous grandeur and feeling for 1798, openly tragic in character, pathetic in its declamation, and wrenching in its passion.

Sonata 8 Op. 13
Beethoven's writing in the Pathétique is striking from the outset. (I don't need to sell this one too much I think...)

Sonata 9 Op. 14, No. 1
...a work in which, to quote Eric Blom, Beethoven "turns every pianistic device to an expressive purpose."

Sonata 10 Op. 14, No. 2
...one of B.'s most relaxed sonatas, a slender work in a key that tended, for B., to evoke music of lightness and grace.

Sonata 11 Op. 22
..a nod to convention..

Sonata 12 Op. 26
...extraordinary command of variation technique. A scherzo follows, setting the stage for the sonata's most dramatic movement, a striking essay in A flat minor subtitled "Funeral March on the death of a Hero." Foreshadowings of the "marcia funebre" from the Eroica Symphony lurk within...

Sonata 13 Op. 27 No. 1
The sonata opens with a "fantasy" movement that has a simple, three-part outline..B. fancifully contrasts the opening and closing sections--based on gently repeated chords--with a breathless middle section that is all gruffly accented chords and flying sixteenth notes.

Sonata 14 Op. 27 No. 2 (Moonlight)
The famously repeated three-note figure here, most likely inspired by the Act I trio of Mozart's Don Giovanni (another "fantastic" nocturnal scene), becomes a fatalistic middle-voice ostinato under the movement's real melody, a tolling subject of truly desolate character... The concluding Allegretto and Presto movements present the sonata's true argument, and are a musical Scylla and Charybdis full of challenges to the performer's skill.

Sonata 15 Op. 28
...foreshadows Beethoven's middle-period manner in its breadth and scope. It is a work of exquisite craftsmanship throughout and, for the most part, poetic content, particularly in the opening Allegro. This relaxed movement, whose amiable first subject is set over a drone, does, however, have a turbulent development section that stays mainly in the minor mode.

Sonata 16 Op. 31 No. 1
The (3rd M) finale is a light-hearted rondo in which the pot is always kept at a boil thanks to the near-continuous cascade of sixteenth notes. There is a wonderful, "you'll never guess where the end comes" coda that caps the humor of this extraordinary "ordinary" sonata.

Sonata 17 Op. 31 No. 2 (Tempest)
The Allegretto finale, also in sonata form, is a gentle country dance of virtually unbroken sixteenth notes, with accents placed in such a way that any rhythmic monotony is avoided. The mood is sad, even somber, with a hint of wistfulness.

Sonata 18 Op. 31 No. 3 (The Hunt)
The scherzo, in 2/4 time rather than the usual 3/4, has a restless quality, enhanced by constantly shifting accents and cross-rhythms as well as some remarkable harmonic manipulations. B.'s gift for melodic invention shows in the theme of the minuet, and there is a subtle play upon expectations throughout the movement.

Sonata 19 Op. 49 No. 1
Sonata 20 Op. 49 No. 2
...composed between 1795 and 1798, and given to a publisher years later, without B.'s consent, - Both carry the designation Leichte Sonate--"Easy Sonata"--which does not mean that they are inferior in any way, just relatively easy to play.

Sonata 21 Op. 53 (Waldstein)
...comes as close to formal perfection and total mastery of materials as any in B.'s canon, and its brilliance, harmonic daring, and sheer energy make it a shining example of the middle-period style

Sonata 22 Op. 54
The finale is remarkable for the fact that, almost throughout, it is written in two single parts, like a Bach invention. The resultant counterpoint, while scarcely going "by the book," produces an alluring play of harmony and texture.

Sonata 23 Op. 57 (Appassionata)
...sinister opening subject that issues sotto voce from the depths of the keyboard. In the opening Allegro there are precipitous changes of mood--from somber, to elegiac, to darkly furious--which listeners will recognize as typical of Beethoven's minor-key expressiveness. Indeed, the accents and contrasts here are so intense that the piano itself sometimes seems to cringe from the task before it.

Sonata 24 Op. 78 (Fur Teresa)
...extremely concise and economical, the dominant affect one of ecstasy untroubled (except by occasional touches of the minor mode) and songful, skipping delight.

Sonata 25 Op. 79
The sonata's Andante is a gentle siciliana, and it unfolds with all the ingenuousness of a short, simple song.

Sonata 26 Op. 81a (Les Adieux)
Grounded in B.'s noble and heroic key of E flat, what follows is music of extraordinary power and imagination dealing with the emotions of separation and reunion--music meant to be listened to with the eyes and heart as well as the ears.

Sonata 27 Op. 90
B. good-naturedly told the sonata's dedicatee, who was about to remarry, that the first movement represented "a struggle between the head and the heart," while the second was "a conversation with the beloved."

Sonata 28 Op. 101
The opening movement, comes prefaced by the marking "mit der innigsten Empfindung" ("with the deepest feeling"). There is a very different character to the ensuing scherzo, which is cast as a quick march: it is brash, forceful, assertive, with sharp dissonances and a tendency toward violence that stands in marked contrast both to the opening movement and this movement's own rather courtly middle section.

Sonata 29 Op. 106 (Hammerklavier)
...some of B.'s most powerful, assertive music. Its exultant opening bars, in which fistfuls of notes are literally hurled at the keyboard, contain the chordal building blocks out of which the entire composition is constructed.... (Re: the Adagio) up to this point in the sonata, Beethoven-the-thunderer has done most of the talking; here, it is "the still, small voice" that is heard...The finale...sets the table for a three-voice fugue so elaborate and eventful it seems more like a fantasy in which long arcs of invention are sustained by brilliant imitative writing.

Sonata 30 Op. 109
...the first movement of Opus 109--in which sections marked Vivace and Adagio alternate with one another according to a freely adapted, fantasia-like version of sonata form--is actually more Hegelian than Darwinian. Within its dialectic of contrast there is remarkable tension, which allows B. a particularly wide range of expression.

Sonata 31 Op. 110
(Re: Finale) ...A series of modulations leading back to A flat prepares the movement's extraordinary conclusion, a hymnlike passage in which B., approaching something like ecstasy, almost runs out of keys at the top end of the piano.

Sonata 32 Op. 111
Its two movements contain some of the most compelling and engrossing music ever penned, and represent perhaps the single most perfect crystallization of B.'s late style outside the final quartets.

Whew!  1,340 words.  So much for a short read.  I highly recommend the unabridged essay - it's superb.

A couple other "Complete Piano Sonata Overview" resources:
Noriaki Nomoto's Page on the 32 Sonatas.
Andras Schiff's Lectures on the 32 Sonatas (mp3 lectures).

Tomorrow I'll feature a different way of looking at Beethoven's 32 sonatas which will only take 2 minutes and 32 seconds...

Monday, January 3, 2011

1/3 Kundera on Beethoven Op.110

Milan Kundera writes about Beethoven's late piano sonata Opus 110:

The Dream of Total Heritage in Beethoven (excerpt)

"...The op.110 sonata amazes me even more (than the Op.106): the fugue is part of the third (final) movement; it is introduced by a short passage of a few bars marked recitative (the melody loses its song-like quality here and becomes speech)... Then comes a composition in four parts. The 1st: an arioso (entirely homophonic, a melody una corda (softly) accompanied by chords in the left hand, mood classically serene); the 2nd: a fugue; 3rd: a variation on that arioso (the same melody turns expressive, plaintive; the mood romantically torn apart); the 4th: a continuation of that fugue, with the theme inverted (it moves from piano to forte and in the four last bars becomes entirely homophonic, without a trace of polyphony).

So within its brief ten-minute span, this third movement (including its short recitative prologue) is notable for its extraordinary heterogeneity of emotion and form; yet the listener does not realize this, because the complexity seems so natural and simple. (Let that be a lesson: the formal innovations of the great masters always have a certain discreetness about them; such is true perfection; only among the small masters does novelty seek to call attention to itself.)

Bringing the fugue (the model form of polyphony) into the sonata (the model form of classical music), Beethoven seems to have laid his hand on the scar left by the passage between two great periods: the one stretching from the earliest polyphony in the twelfth century up to Bach, and the next one grounded in what we have come to term “homophony.” As if he had wondered: is the legacy of polyphony still mine?... and how could the serene spirit of polyphony resist the emotional subjectivity of the music born of classicism? can two such opposite conceptions of music co-exist? ...I imagine that Beethoven wrote his sonatas dreaming he was heir to the whole of European music since its beginnings."

Piano Sonata Op. 110 3rd Movement - Rudolf Serkin 1987
Adagio intro at 0:00
Recitative starts at 0:30 
Arioso at 1:26
Fugue at 3:22
Arioso Var 6:00
Fugue continued 8:26



Interesting thoughts.  Beethoven is usually credited as bridging the classical and the romantic periods in classical music, but Kundera later here gives B. credit for summing up the whole history of music in one miovement (kind of)!  Actually B goes right up to the present IMHO - some late Beethoven works certainly fit right in with Prokofiev and Bartok...not to mention the recent Stockhausen/Beethoven double concert....

More on this endlessly fascinating piano sonata in some previous posts here and here.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

9/28 Online Books about Beethoven's Music

A little while ago I posted about all the "tell-all" Beethoven books available to view (in their entirety) on the internet.  Today's round up is a selection of books about B's music.  I actually have some of the books below in physical dead-tree form, but for search-ability and the ability to cut and paste (since I actually hate typing, believe it or not) these resources are very handy for daily blogging about Beethoven.

From Google Books:

Beethoven and his 9 Symphonies (Grove)
This is a very readable book with plenty of very brief music examples.  Sir George gives a good overview of the important themes and outstanding rhythms of each movement of the 9 Symphonies.  You only need a little music background to appreciate this.

Beethoven (Kinderman)
This version of Kinderman's book is the first edition. It has since been revised (which is why this version is available for free here I imagine).  A few degrees more technical than the Grove book, Kinderman does a great job of concentrating on the music in greater depth and covers all the important works including the string quartets, piano sonatas and other chamber works.  To savored slowly.

There's alot more here.

From The Internet Archive:

Beethoven Studies (Misch, 1953)
A pretty interesting collection of topics about B's music - individual essays covering specific works and concepts, haven't read it yet but looks pretty good.
Here's the TOC:
i The Grand Fugue 3
ii Alia danza tedesca 14
in Two B Flat Major Themes 19
iv The Finale of the C Major Quartet 3 2
v The "Problem" of the D minor Sonata 3 9
vi T*wo Comments on the A Flat Major Sonata 54
vn The Thematic Treatment of the Egmont Overture 76
vni Pseudo and Riddle Canons by Beethoven 106
ix Why Did Beethoven Write the Fourth Overture to Fidelio? 139
x The Battle of Victoria 153
xi Annotations on Some Piano-forte Sonatas 163
xn "The Upper Pitches of the Voices ...." 167
xiii Beethoven Studies
xm Non si fa una cadenza 1 7 1
xiv Fidelia : an Ethical Confession 179

Beethoven's Pianoforte Sonatas (Elterlein)
A somewhat dated overview of each of B's piano sonatas, each sonata gets it's own chapter.  Actually how dated can it be, Beethoven can't exactly make revisions now can he?  Not too technical, more descriptive.No music examples.

Analysis of form in Beethoven's Sonatas (Harding)
This is an awesome book for structural analysis, like the kind I do on this blog.  Harding charts out the structure of each piano sonata with accompanying notes.  Why is this not in bookstores?  Next to the Tovey "Guide to the Pianoforte Sonatas" this is the one to go to.  Not cut-and-paste-able unfortunately (otherwise I could practically do an HOURLY Beethoven blog).

Here you find a whole truckload of Beethoven books.  Even the one by Wagner(Spoiler alert - if you ever come across Wagner's account of how he met Beethoven - it's a fantasy.  Interesting read tho).

Read all those books and you can start your own daily Beethoven blog!

Friday, September 17, 2010

9/17 Beethoven "Tell-All" Books

Josephine von Brunsvick-Deym
(possible Immortal Beloved?)
There are many books about Beethoven, probably over a thousand even if you only count ones published in English, German and French.  Fortunately, there are quite a few available to read for free from the internet, and some you can download.

Here's just a few written by Beethoven's contemporaries.  Some of these tend to be of the "biographical romance" style, so may not be EXACTLY honest.

Beethoven Depicted by his Contemporaries 
 "Beethoven was dressed in a jacket and trousers of long, dark goat's hair, which at once reminded me of the description of Robinson Crusoe I had just been reading. He had a shock of jet black hair (cut d la Titus) standing straight upright. A beard of several days' growth made his naturally dark face still blacker. I noticed also, with a child's quick observation, that he had cotton wool, which seemed to have been dipped in some yellow fluid, in both ears."
By Ludwig Nohl (this has a good variety of different writings, probably the best overall).
Giulietta Guicciardi

Furioso; or, Passages from the life of Ludwig van Beethoven
"He looked round. It was Adelaide. He looked at her with an unutterable expression. Was she not the goal of all his dreams? And she was alone. His heart beat fast, while his breath seemed to fail him.

He sprang up with a deep blush, and putting his hand to his brow seemed to struggle for utterance. But tongue and lips refused their office. His limbs failed him. Then falling upon one knee, he seized the girl's hand, covered it with kisses, inarticulately murmuring, " I love!"

The young countess screamed with terror, and struggled to free her hand from his grasp. A side door suddenly opened. The count and the countess rushed in. Their indignation knew no bounds. The count threw himself between them, thundering forth, " Madman! away, out of my house!" "
 By Franz Gerhard Wegeler (written by B's childhood friend, except that his friend was really old when he wrote this, so not sure how trustworthy this might be.  Fun reading tho.)

An Unrequited Love: From the Diary of a Young Lady
" May 27th.—He was with us the evening before last, but his conduct is at times so very moody and unfriendly that I feel shy with him, and dare not venture to be on the intimate terms that we all so much enjoyed in the winter. Circumstances are in fault, I have no doubt; but the hope I once indulged in, that Beethoven might become our devoted friend, can scarcely be realised now that he cools towards us at the very first misunderstanding."
By Fanny Giannatasio del Rio (one of B's lady friends, not as steamy as you might expect...it was 'unrequited' after all).

Beethoven: A Biographical Romance
"Beethoven answered not a word. He was pale as death. Thick drops of cold sweat rested upon his forehead. His eyes stared, fixed with horror, and his features took in the stiffness of marble. Within, with a horrible pain, came up the cry, " The cloud! the black cloud !" Beethoven, Beethoven, man of tone, thou shalt hear nothing more! thou shalt hear nothing more! Great God, thou art growing deaf!"
By Heribert Rau (didn't read this one yet, looks pretty "dramatized")

The Life of Beethoven 
"...I was walking with him over the Graben, when we met M. Schenk, then far advanced between sixty and seventy. Beethoven, transported with joy to see his old friend still among the living, seized his hand, hastened with him into a neighbouring tavern called the Bugle Horn, and conducted us into a back room, where, as in a catacomb, it was necessary to burn a light even at noon-day. There we shut ourselves in, and Beethoven began to open all the recesses of his heart to his respected corrector. More talkative than he often was, a multitude of stories and anecdotes of long by-gone times presented themselves to his recollection, and among the rest the affair with Haydn ; and Beethoven, who had now raised himself to the sovereignty in the realm of music, loaded the modest composer of the Dorfbarbier, who was living in narrow circumstances, with professions of his warmest thanks for the kindness which he had formerly shown him. Their parting, after that memorable hour, as if for life, was deeply affecting; and, in fact, from that day, they never beheld one another again."
by Anton Schindler (the notorious Schindler who was B's friend and assistant for much of B's later years.  Too bad he forged so many of B's letters. This link actually points to a different book, but it reprints the Schindler book in its entirety as part of it.)

Beethoven, The Man And The Artist: As Revealed in His Own Words 
"They are incessantly talking about the C-sharp minor sonata ("Moonlight", op. 27, No. 2); on my word I have written better ones. The F-sharp major sonata ("To Therese", op. 78) is a different thing!"
By Friedrich Kerst, Henry Edward Krehbiel  (Forgotten Books reprint(Project Gutenberg book)
(fascinating collection of quotes by B himself.  From the horse's mouth, so to speak)

There are dozens more "e-books" floating around the web, some other time I'll round up the music-related ones....

Friday, September 10, 2010

9/10 Beethoven Rock Reviews

Composing "purely cerebral abstractions of sound"?
Nowadays Beethoven is generally considered one of (if not the) greatest and most influential composer of all time.  But throughout history, from Beethoven's own time to the last hundred years, B still got 'pen and ink' rocks thrown at him from some unenlightened critics. 

Here's an early one I found on the fascinating  Raptus Association Beethoven site (The Magnificent Master):

On 10 Variations on a theme by Salieri, WoO.73: 
With these, one can not be satisfied, at all. How stiff they are and how contrived and what unpleasant passages are in them, in which hard tirades in continuing half-tones against the bass create an ugly relationship and vice versa.  No, it is true, Mr. B. might be able to improvise, but he can not write variations, very well. 
ALLGEMEINE MUSIKALISCHE ZEITUNG

I wonder what they thought then of the Diabelli Variations?  The last review in today's post will give some clue maybe...
 
The Raptus site has a massive archive of contemporary reviews, but most are actually pretty positive, so for the purposes of this post we must turn to:

Nicolas Slonimsky's "Lexicon of Musical Invective":

"Beethoven's 2nd Symphony is a crass monster, a hideously writhing wounded dragon, that refuses to expire, and though bleeding in the Finale, furiously beats about with its tail erect."
Zeitung fur die Elegente Welt Vienna, May 1804

On the Fidelio Overture:  "...incoherent, shrill, chaotic and ear-splitting...The most piercing dissonances clash in a really atrocious harmony, and a few puny ideas only increase the disagreeable and deafening effect."
Kotzebue, Der Freimutige Vienna 9/11/1806

On Piano Sonata Op.111 m2:  "The greater portion of it is written in 9/16, but a part is in 6/16, and about a page in 12/32.  All this really is laborious trifling, and ought to be by every means discouraged by the sensible part of the musical profession...We have devoted a full hour to this enigma, and cannot solve it."
The Harmonicon London Aug 1823

On the 7th Symphony: "...a great deal of disagreeable eccentricity...Altogether, it seems to have been intended as a kind of enigma - we had almost said a hoax."
The Harmonicon London July 1825

On String Quartet #13:  "To quote an ingeniously picturesque saying from one of our foremost composers...  Beethoven's imagination in the Finale suggests a poor swallow flitting incessantly in a hermetically sealed box, to the annoyance of our eyes and ears."
Blanchard, Revue et Gazette Musicale de Paris 4/15/1849

On the Piano Sonata Op.106 Finale (Hammerklavier): "...a raw and undigested mass (mess?)"
Lenz, "Beethoven et ses trois styles" Paris 1855

On the 5th Symphony 3rd movement ending:  "Here you have a fragment of 44 measures, where Beethoven deemed it necessary to suspend the habeas corpus of music by stripping it of all that might resemble melody, harmony and any sort of rhythm...Is it music, yes or no?  If I am answered in the affirmative, I would say that this does not belong to the art which I am in the habit of considering as music."
Oulibicheff   Beethoven, ses critiques et ses glossateurs" Paris 1857 

Ironically, for young modern audiences, these descriptions would probably get them more curious!  

Here's a nugget I came across at a blog called Stalin's Moustache:

"Beethoven’s B flat major Sonata and the Diabelli Variations are ‘acoustical atrocities’ which are ‘ultimately unplayable because they are written for an instrument which has never existed and never will exist’. These two works ‘do not employ real sound but incorporeal, purely cerebral abstractions of sound, borrowing the language of the keyboard only as a rough, basically sketchy alphabet'"
Ernst Bloch, Philosophy of Music, p. 118

I'm not sure if that really could be considered criticism, but it actually sounds pretty cool.

Anyways here's more of the Slonimsky book below, I believe the entire Beethoven chapter is available for preview....

Friday, August 27, 2010

8/27 Some Letters from Beethoven

Some select missives from the Maestro...
From

Letter 41.TO HERR MEYER.    1805.

DEAR MEYER,--

Pray try to persuade Herr v. Seyfried to direct my Opera, as I wish on this occasion to see and hear it myself from a distance; in this way my patience will at all events not be so severely tried as when I am close enough to hear my music so bungled. I really do believe that it is done on purpose to annoy me! I will say nothing of the wind-instruments; but all pp.'s, cresc., discresc., and all f.'s and ff.'s may as well be struck out of my Opera, for no attention whatever is paid to them. I shall lose all pleasure in composing anything in future, if I am to hear it given thus. To-morrow or the day after I will come to fetch you to dinner. To-day I am again unwell.
Your friend,
BEETHOVEN.

If the Opera is to be performed the day after to-morrow, there must be another private rehearsal to-morrow, or each time it will be given worse and worse.

Meyer, the husband of Mozart's eldest sister-in-law, Josepha (Hofer's widow), sang the part of Pizarro at the first performance of Fidelio, Nov. 20, 1805, and also at a later period. Seyfried was at that time Kapellmeister at the Theatre "an der Wien."


"X" brought the Trio in C minor (Op. 1, No. 3) to show to Beethoven, having arranged it as a quintet for stringed instruments (published by Artaria as Op. 104). Beethoven evidently discovered a good many faults in the work; still, the undertaking had sufficient attractions to induce him to correct it himself, and to make many changes in it. A very different score was thus of course produced from that of "X", on the cover of whose work the genial master, in a fit of good humor, inscribed with his own hand the following title:--

A Terzet arranged as a Quintet,
by Mr. Well-meaning,

translated from the semblance into the reality of five parts, and exalted from the depths of wretchedness to a certain degree of excellence,

by Mr. Goodwill.
Vienna, Aug. 14, 1817.

N.B. The original three-part score of the Quintet has been sacrificed as a solemn burnt-offering to the subterranean gods.



Letter 325.TO SCHINDLER.

--Inquire of that arch-churl Diabelli when the French copy of the Sonata in C minor [Op. 111] is to be published. I stipulated to have five copies for myself, one of which is to be on fine paper, for the Cardinal [the Archduke Rudolph]. If he attempts any of his usual impertinence on this subject, I will sing him in person a bass aria in his warehouse which shall cause it and all the street (Graben) to ring!

Schindler relates that Diabelli had refused to let Beethoven again have the MS. of the Sonata, which he had repeatedly sent for when in the hands of the engraver, in order to correct and improve it. Diabelli therefore coolly submitted to all this abuse of the enraged composer, and wrote to him that he would note down the threatened bass aria, and publish it, but would give him the usual gratuity for it, and that Beethoven had better come to see him. On this Beethoven said no more.


Letter 343.TO SCHINDLER.    Hetzendorf, 1823.

SAMOTHRACIAN VAGABOND!--

You were dispatched yesterday to the South Pole, whereas we went off to the North Pole, a slight difference now equalized by Captain Parry. There were, however, no mashed potatoes there.
--
Your Friend Amicus,
BEETHOVEN.

He no doubt alludes to Captain Parry, the celebrated traveller, who wrote an article in the A.M. Zeitung on the music of the Esquimaux.